Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Compassion vs. Communism


Or is it peace versus authoritarianism? People tend to see them as interchangeable.

Having just seen the movie Kundun rented at Blockbuster, I cannot fathom why Mao did not want to work with the Dalai Lama to achieve their goals. The Dalai Lama was told by Mao that "religion is the opiate of the masses." Well you can believe something is awful, but what do you replace it with? Communism replaced it with the same thing America did: materialism. Americans pray to the dollar just as the Chinese now do.

Regardless how the Chinese religion has changed,the Olympics are an opportunity to rectify past and current wrongs. It could be a time when Tibet can gain meaningful autonomy. This is what they want, not an independence wrought with war against China. Allowing the Tibetan people the opportunity to speak their language openly and freely. Allowing the Tibetan people to practice the religion of their own choosing. But how are they to do this if the Dalai Lama is not even allowed to attend the Olympics?

China has decided where it stands on human rights - on the side of tyranny. Are the Olympics just another long version of the Super Bowl - just another sport to pray to the almighty Dollar? If they are, then we can send China a message through our mutual societal faith: boycotting the Olympics.

Of course, my Communist acquaintances believe that Tibet was a feudal state under the 16-year old Dalai Lama. Decades after the occupation of Tibet began, they still state their feelings word for word what the Chinese media stated in the movie Kundun. But if Communism has been so wonderful for Tibet, why do ethnic Han still have to uphold their rule by military power? Wouldn't the Tibetans welcome their liberators? I guess we only have to look at our delightful occupation of Iraq. Of course the life of Saddam Hussein and the Dalai Lama aren't anywhere near the same, regardless what the Chinese propaganda of the day is. But I don't think my Communist acquaintances will watch Kundun, preferring to read the latest on Xinhua.

No comments: